AN232

AN232 Low Frequency Magnetic Transmitter Design Author: Ruan Lourens Microchip Technology Inc. ABOUT THIS APPLICATION NOTE This Application Note covers some basic aspects to consider when designing the transmitter portion of a LFMC link, such as: • A description of the components that comprise the LFMC link. • Explanation of the magnetic basics and assumptions made in the Application Note. • Calculating the generated field strength that is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance. • A practical method for generating a magnetic field is to create a serial resonant tank circuit. • Data transfer is, in turn, accomplished by amplitude modulation of the field. • Basic data formats that can be used in this kind of application. • A description of a typical drive circuitry to generate the LFMC field. INTRODUCTION Low frequency magnetic communications (LFMC) is a viable “wireless” communications alternative to traditional radio frequency (RF) or Infrared communications. It is well suited for certain applications when considering some of the characteristics of the topology. Some of the main advantages of using low frequency magnetic communications are: • Good field penetration capabilities - Can penetrate non-magnetic materials such as water, concrete, plastic, etc. (no line-of-sight required). • Limited and precise control of range - This may be a disadvantage if long range is required, but for certain applications this is a big advantage where limited or fixed range is required. For example, it is useful in automotive communications, or invisible fence control such as required for pets or water safety around pools. • Low power designs are possible, especially on the receiver side. This factor makes LFMC very attractive for PKE (Passive Keyless Entry), where the key fob constantly “listens” for a valid car and the device needs to be powered by small lithium batteries with years of useful battery life. It is useful in TPM (Tire Pressure Monitoring) where the sensor is awakened by a low frequency signal to preserve battery life. • Low frequency design techniques (i.e., relatively low frequency compared to RF) allow the designer to use low frequency analog tools and building blocks. The designer has the freedom to use regular Op Amps, comparators, and a general-purpose oscilloscope. • Energy transfer - It is possible to power a receiver from the magnetic field. A good example is RFID, or alternatively, a low voltage back-up. • Low cost - A low cost transceiver can easily be implemented by adding a resonant tank (LC) to a microcontroller with a PWM and comparator. LFMC LINK COMPONENTS A LFMC link (see Figure 1) in its most basic form consists of a field generation source transmitter and a magnetic sensor that is sensitive to the generated field. Thus, there needs to be a field propagation path to “link” the transmitter and receiver. The propagating medium plays a major role in the performance of the communications link. It should be stressed that magnetic field behavior is not the same for electromagnetic waves normally associated with RF communications. Electromagnetic waves propagate for long distances in free space. The RF electromagnetic wave is, however, susceptible to scattering and distortion. Magnetic field lines, however, are less prone to distortion and known to penetrate water very well. A magnetic field does attenuate much more rapidly when compared to an electromagnetic wave. This document focuses primarily on serial resonant tanks as a field transmission source. The tank consists of an air-coiled inductor and capacitor. Signal detection is typically accomplished with a parallel resonant tank.  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. DS00232A-page 1 AN232 To increase sensitivity, one ensures that the transmitter (TX) tank and receiver (RX) tank resonant frequencies are the same as the desired magnetic field frequency. Another aspect to bear in mind is that sensitivity is dependant on the angle between coil face and the field lines. Maximum response is obtained when the lines pass through the coil perpendicularly, as shown in Figure 1. The question then is; what is the link between magnetic/electric fields and electromagnetic waves? To find the answer, we need to consider some properties of both magnetic and electric fields. The first is that a time-varying electric field induces a magnetic field and, conversely, that a time-varying magnetic field induces an electric field. These are special cases of Amperes and Faraday’s laws, respectively. Therefore, a time-varying field of either kind induces and reinforces a field of the other kind. If the signal wavelength (magnetic or electric) approaches the dimension of the antenna, the magnetic electric reinforcement becomes strong enough to allow for electromagnetic wave propagation. For an antenna that is very small compared to the signal wavelength, one does not have an efficient propagating wave decaying at 1/r; instead, one has an attenuating field that falls off at 1/r.3 The effect, however, is negligible if the antenna dimensions are small relative to the wavelength of the exciting signal. The wavelength of a signal can be calculated using Equation 1, and at 125 kHz is a long length of 2.4 km! FIGURE 1: ALIGNMENT OF FIELD LINES WITH COIL FACES Field Lines Source V Meter The TX and RX coils can be thought of as a weaklycoupled transformer, across which data may be transmitted by modulating the source (or transmitter) and detecting the modulated signal at the receiver. MAGNETISM BASICS It is important to note the difference between a magnetic field/electric field versus an electromagnetic wave. A magnetic field is a result of electrical charge in motion, or a magnetic dipole. One also only gets magnetic dipoles and not monopoles, as is the case for electrical particles. A magnetic field can, therefore, be represented by field lines that form continuous loops that never cross each other. Electric fields, on the other hand, are the result of a distributed electrical charge. What both magnetic and electric fields share in common is that the field strength of both fields attenuates at a rate of 1/r3 when the source geometry is assumed to be a point source. What this means is that the field intensity at a distance 2X away from the source is 1/8th of the field intensity measured at a distance X from the source. However, an electromagnetic wave reacts quite differently than the magnetic or electric field. Assuming the same point source, the electromagnetic wave propagates with a decay rate of 1/r. Thus, at a distance of 2X from the point source, the field intensity is only 1/2 compared to that measured at a distance of X from the source. This means that a magnetic field decays much more rapidly than an electromagnetic wave. The magnetic field energy can be thought of as a cloud of energy packed around the source. On the other hand, one can imagine an RF wave as a sphere radiating outward from the source at the speed of light, with the wave energy spread out across the outer surface of the sphere. EQUATION 1: λ= c [meters] ƒ c = 3 x 108 m/s An antenna approaching this dimension is impractical, but at 500 MHz the wavelength is only 60 cm. Higher frequency antenna dimensions are thus much more practical and a true propagating wave is easily realizable. . Note: For LFMC, a small component of the total energy is in the form of an electromagnetic wave, but that is negligible compared to the magnetic energy of a 125 kHz magnetic antenna. Calculating The Magnetic Field Strength For most LFMC applications when calculating field strength, a magnetic field is generated by a base station by setting up an oscillatory current in a series RLC network at a typical resonant frequency of 125 kHz. The current passing through the inductor creates a surrounding magnetic field according to Ampere’s Law. Using Equation 2, one can calculate the absolute magnetic field strength B at a point P from the radiating coil, as shown in Figure 2. DS00232A-page 2  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. AN232 EQUATION 2: Bp ω o INa ω o INa = ------------------------------- ≈ ------------------ [ ( Weber ) ⁄ m ] 3⁄2 3 2 2 2r 2(a + r ) 2 2 well. Adding a core has the effect of increasing the effective surface area, enabling one to reduce the physical size of the coil. Serial Resonance A typical serial resonant tank circuit is shown in Figure 3. where ωο = frequency in [Rad/S] I = Current [A] N = Number of turns a = radius of coil [m] r = distance from coil [m] FIGURE 3: SERIAL RESONANT TANK CIRCUIT L C IS + VS R FIGURE 2: CALCULATING MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH X current flow a r The formulas for calculating serial resonant tank values are shown in Equation 4. Y coil P Z EQUATION 4: 2π ⋅ F0 = I max Q= Note: For r >> a, the field strength falls of with 1/r3. 1 = ω0 LC = Vs / R (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) The field strength is therefore proportional to the: • Number of turns (N) • Current (I) • Area of the loop (a2) As one moves away from the source with r>>a the simplified equation again shows the characteristic 1/r3 attenuation. For practical reasons, the designer may prefer to use the voltage of the inductor (VL) to calculate the field strength using Equation 3. VL max = VC max = Q ⋅ Vs ω0 ω0 L 1 = = β R ω 0CR β =ω 2−ω 1= R / L Note that R represents all losses such as resistive, magnetic, etc. A short description of each equation given above is as follows: (a) Used to calculate the resonant frequency of the tank. (b) Gives the maximum serial current as a function of applied voltage (note this is not the same as inductor or capacitor current) and effective serial resistance. (c) Shows that the inductor and capacitor voltage is equal to Q times the source voltage at resonance. (d) Shows all the various ways to calculate the Quality Factor (Q) of the tank circuit. (e) Used to calculate the 3 dB bandwidth. Figure 4 shows the frequency response curve for a typical serial resonant tank circuit. EQUATION 3: VL a 1 B ≈ -----------------  ---- 2 ω o π N  r 3 with L ≈ for r>>a From Equation 3 with a given coil voltage at some distance from the coil, one now finds that B is inversely proportional to N. This is due to the fact that the current increases at the rate of 1/N2 with a given coil voltage. Only the case of an air-coiled inductor has been described, but one can use a ferrite-cored inductor as N2 µοπa  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. DS00232A-page 3 AN232 FIGURE 4: 25 FREQUENCY RESPONSE CURVE FOR RESONANT TANK CIRCUIT Serial IM = VS/R 20 F0 15 V (mV) F1 F2 Vo -3dB 10 IM -----2 5 0 110800 111700 112600 113500 114400 115300 116200 117100 118000 118900 119800 120700 121600 122500 123400 124300 125200 126100 127000 127900 128800 129700 130600 131500 132400 133300 134200 135100 136000 136900 137800 138700 ω1 ω0 ω2 F (Hz) MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES A good rule of thumb is to stay within the -3 dB limits, giving component tolerances by Equation 5. EQUATION 5: Q≤ Tcap 1 + Tind TCAP and TIND are the individual manufacturing tolerances for capacitance and inductance. For 2% parts, a Q of 20 works very well. Lower tolerance components may be used at the expense of sensitivity, and thus yielding a lower range. The corresponding final design must accommodate a wider bandwidth and will, therefore, have a lower response. An example of a half bridge drive systems dynamic response is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5 shows the typical response when turning a tank circuit on (i.e., applying a drive signal) and, after some time, switching the tank off again. It can be seen that the oscillations amplitude increases rapidly upon start-up. It then increases up to a maximum amplitude as predicted by Equation 4. There is some finite time required for the tank to start-up and reach the eventual maximum amplitude. There is similarly a finite time required for the tank oscillations to decrease to some desired level. The rise and fall times will be the predominant factors in choosing a baud rate. Other factors are more concerned with receiver design and choice of AGC (Automatic Gain Control) topology. LFte is the elemental period used in LF communication, and a practical value is 400 µs or longer. The Manchester, PWM, and PPM data formats are shown in Figure 6. Manchester has the advantage of having a constant duty cycle and more efficient data rate. PWM encoding, on the other hand, simplifies the receiver decoding and improves the bit error rate. When designing an LFMC system, one should keep in mind that it will be exposed to noisy environments. It is a good idea to incorporate some error correction and detection scheme upon implementing a communication protocol. Data Formats In designing a LFMC system, one has the choice of implementing any one of a large variety of modulation formats. On-Off Keying (OOK) lends itself well to realizing a practical and reliable system. With OOK, the signal is modulated by simply turning the field generation source on and off, depending on a chosen data format. DS00232A-page 4  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. 139600 F AN232 FIGURE 5: DATA BIT RISE AND FALL TIMES Control 130 µs 200 µs Residual Field Start Stop FIGURE 6: DATA MODULATION FORMATS PWM Format: 1 LFTE LOGIC ’0’ 1 LFTE 1 LFTE LOGIC ’0’ 1 LFTE PPM Format: 1 LFTE Manchester Format: 1 LFTE LOGIC ’0’ LOGIC ’1’ 1 LFTE LOGIC ’1’ 1 LFTE LOGIC ’1’ 1 LFTE  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. DS00232A-page 5 AN232 DRIVE CIRCUITRY One of the most efficient methods to drive the resonant tank is a class - D drive circuit in either a full or half bridge mode. Figure 7 shows a typical 1/2 bridge implementation. One gets very good results with a 1/2 bridge, and it has the advantage of being low cost and it is easy to implement. The use of a serial resonant tank circuit becomes clearer in this section. A high Q serial resonant circuit has its lowest impedance at resonance. The current passing through the antenna coil shown in Figure 7 consists mostly of the fundamental current component, although the drive circuit uses square wave excitation that has very high harmonic content. Be sure to use high quality capacitors with low tolerances (see ‘Calculating the Bandwidth and Q’ section on tolerances). A good choice is Panasonic polypropylene film capacitors - ECQO(µ) series, rated at either 400V or 600V as they reduce losses and are relatively stable over temperature variations. The circuit shown in Figure 7 gives 135 VRMS out across the inductor and capacitor. It consumes 0.5 ARMS at 12V with a constant output. This means that the average current consumption is typically 0.25 ARMS for Manchester encoding. The drive signal can be generated directly by the PWM unit on most PICmicro® microcontrollers such as a PIC16F627 microcontroller. For a device operating at 20 MHz, one can obtain a 125 kHz signal by setting the Timer2 prescaler to 1. A period of 8 µs is then obtained by setting the PR2 register to 39. To get a 50% duty cycle output, set CCPR1L to 14 and CCP1CON to . These settings will ensure a constant carrier. To modulate the data, one can turn the drive signal on and off by setting and clearing the CCP1RIL bit. There are various transmission formats that can be used to transfer data, but keep the rise and fall times of the resonant tank in mind. The response for the circuit in Figure 8 is shown in Figure 5. The drive circuit was modulated on and off at 400 µs intervals. FIGURE 7: SQUARE WAVE EXCITATION V+ Q = 25 Vs + VL - Towards a Faster Response The rise and fall times are limiting factors to shortening LFTE from a field generation perspective. In order to increase the baud rate, one needs to accelerate the turn-on and/or turn-off response. Figure 9 shows a modification of the basic circuit in Figure 7 to accomplish both a faster turn-on and turn-off time. The basic bridge drive circuit shown earlier took about 130 µs to reach 90% of full-scale value. The start-up time can be decreased by starting the tank in full bridge mode, then maintaining resonance in 1/2 bridge mode, once full scale is reached. This concept can be implemented (see Figure 9) by using two FET drivers as the two halves of the full bridge converter. The tank is started up by driving the two 1/2 bridge drivers 180° out of phase. This effectively doubles the applied source voltage. As soon as the full-scale amplitude is reached, the other 1/2 bridge driver is grounded. A circuit based on two TC442X FET drivers takes about 40 µs to reach full-scale. That is a significant speed increase compared to the 120 µs to reach 90% of full-scale for the standard 1/2 bridge system. Herein lies a warning: if the resonant capacitor voltage rating is not at least double the 1/2 bridge full-scale voltage swing, then care should be taken to ensure that 1/2 bridge mode is engaged before the output voltage swing becomes too large. A good safety backup is to engage the 1/2 bridge after 6 full bridge cycles, irrespective of the output voltage. Vs = VL = 12V VPP = 300V A very economical and straightforward drive circuit can be realized with the circuit shown in Figure 8. FIGURE 8: +12V SIMPLIFIED DRIVE CIRCUIT 10 µF PWM TC4422 400 VDC drive signal 5V L = 160 µH a = 25 mm wire = 26 AWG N = 41 Microchip’s high-current MOSFET drivers (such as TC4421/TC4422) are very suitable for this application. The device takes care of all the necessary level translations and deadband control, resulting in a very efficient and fast output, thereby reducing cost and losses. These devices have the added advantage that they can be directly driven from logic levels. DS00232A-page 6  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. AN232 Toward Faster Turn-Off Figure 9 shows a turn-off acceleration circuit. A triac is used to discharge the resonant tank at turn-off. This circuit works instantaneously. The triac is typically fired at a voltage of zero, which reduces the EMI radiation. The PWM bridge drive is in phase with the tank current if the tank is properly tuned. The tank current and voltage are 90 degrees out of phase. Figure 10 shows proper turn-off timing. This turn-off clamp circuit also has the advantage that there is no residual field left after turn-off. This simplifies receiver design by reducing the receiver’s AGC functionality. A good receiver AGC is needed when operating close to a source that does not have a turnoff clamp. The AGC circuit needs to be able to distinguish between valid data and the residual field. If the receiver is unable to do so, it will interpret the field as being continuously high. Note: The design examples shown in Figure 8, Figure 9, and Figure 10 have not been independently tested for conformance to FCC regulations. FIGURE 9: MODIFICATION OF THE BASIC CIRCUIT Clamp Enable Full Bridge PWM FIGURE 10: TURN-OFF TIMING Tank Voltage Triac PWM  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. DS00232A-page 7 AN232 BASE STATION CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION The drive circuitry (see Appendix A) consists of TC4422 (U2) and TC4421 (U3). U3 is an inverting FET driver and U2 is a non-inverting FET driver. U3 is the main 1/2 bridge drive device and U2 is only used during start-up as explained previously. During the first 5 cycles of start-up, both U2 and U3 work in tandem as a full bridge drive circuit. In full bridge mode, U2 and U3 are driven from the PWM output via RB3. At this time, RB4 is defined as an input and thus has no influence on the input signal to U2. The driver is converted to a 1/2 bridge made after the 5 start-up cycles by driving point A to ground. This is done by changing RB4 from an input to a low level (i.e., zero) output. This has no influence on the signal to U3, but it grounds U2. One can remove U2 and physically ground point A if a fast turn-on is not required. Removing U2 also increases the efficiency and output voltage slightly. Power Supply The circuit consumes roughly 0.5 ARMS when transmitting continuously in 1/2 bridge mode. It consumes approximately double that amount of current during the 40 µs start-up. The average transmitting power consumption is 0.25 ARMS for Manchester encoding. Instantaneous peak current is about 1.2 A. The overall current consumption when transmitting data continuously is roughly 3 Watts, but adequate tank capacitance is needed to supply the relatively high peak current and reduce supply ripple. C4 is the main smoothing capacitor. A Panasonic FC series 25V 560 µF is used because of its 1.2 A ripple current specification. C2 and C3 are local DC coupling capacitors for U2 and U3, and are 20V 0.68 µF tantilum capacitors. Communications Serial communications is performed via the UART on the PIC16F628, and the voltage translation is done with a MAX232. Flow control using CTS and RTS is implemented on RB6 and RB5 respectively. Turn-On Timing Figure 11 shows the proper turn-on sequence referenced from the PWM output cycles. CONCLUSION The choice of a PIC16F628 with a PWM lends itself towards an effective design of a low frequency magnetic transmitter circuit. In addition, the TC4421/ TC4422’s are well suited as FET driver for this type of application. The main advantages of using low frequency magnetic transmitter design are: • • • • Good field penetration Precise range control Low power consumption Overall low cost Turn-Off Clamp The turn-off clamp is realized by discharging the resonant tank through R1, R2 and a 600 V rated triac Q1. Q1 is a Q6x3 surface mound triac from Teccor Electronics. The high tank voltages necessitate the need for two small serial resistors. Alternatively, one can use a single high-voltage resistor. A single PNP transistor T1 forms a gated drive circuit and is activated by driving RB7 low. Refer to the previous section for timing requirements. The clamp circuit ensures that no residual energy is left in the tank, thus simplifying receiver design (this is not needed for LFTE’s of 400 µs or more). FIGURE 11: 0 TURN-ON TIMING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PWM (RB3) TRISB.4 A B Full Bridge Start-Up Half Bridge Mode DS00232A-page 8  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. APPENDIX A: BASE STATION CIRCUIT +12V (CTS) +5V RB6 RB5 RB4 R2 10 Ω 2N3906 N/C Q1 Q6x3 RB3 RB7 R19 1k N/C N/C N/C 14 7 13 8 4 C4 + 5 1 µF 1 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 RB3 VCC 16 +5V 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 T1 10 k R3 20 MHz XTAL 18 RA1 RA2 N/C C7 12 pF 17 RA3 RA0 N/C RA4/TO RA7 16 15 MCLR RA6 VSS VDD 14 C812 pF RB0/INT RB7 13 RB7 12 RB1 RB6 RB6 RB2 RB5 11 RB5 10 RB4 RB3 RB4 +5V PIC16F628 C6 0.1 µF 6 15 GND 11 T1OUT T1IN T2OUT T2IN 10 12 R1IN R1OUT 9 R2IN R2OUT 1 C2+ C1+ 3 1 µF C2C1C5 6 V+ J1 R1 100Ω C3 1 µF +  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. +12V C3 600V B U3 U1 1 4421 C5 47 µF 6.3V C2 +12V 30 k C1 R1 10 Ω +5V LM7805 C4 470 µF 4422 U2 A (RTS) +5V MAX232ECWE + C1 1 µF C2 1 µF + V+ 2 1k DB-9 Standard RS-232 Interface AN232 DS00232A-page 9 AN232 NOTES: DS00232A-page 10  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. Note the following details of the code protection feature on PICmicro® MCUs. • • • The PICmicro family meets the specifications contained in the Microchip Data Sheet. Microchip believes that its family of PICmicro microcontrollers is one of the most secure products of its kind on the market today, when used in the intended manner and under normal conditions. There are dishonest and possibly illegal methods used to breach the code protection feature. All of these methods, to our knowledge, require using the PICmicro microcontroller in a manner outside the operating specifications contained in the data sheet. The person doing so may be engaged in theft of intellectual property. Microchip is willing to work with the customer who is concerned about the integrity of their code. Neither Microchip nor any other semiconductor manufacturer can guarantee the security of their code. Code protection does not mean that we are guaranteeing the product as “unbreakable”. Code protection is constantly evolving. We at Microchip are committed to continuously improving the code protection features of our product. • • • If you have any further questions about this matter, please contact the local sales office nearest to you. Information contained in this publication regarding device applications and the like is intended through suggestion only and may be superseded by updates. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application meets with your specifications. No representation or warranty is given and no liability is assumed by Microchip Technology Incorporated with respect to the accuracy or use of such information, or infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights arising from such use or otherwise. Use of Microchip’s products as critical components in life support systems is not authorized except with express written approval by Microchip. No licenses are conveyed, implicitly or otherwise, under any intellectual property rights. Trademarks The Microchip name and logo, the Microchip logo, KEELOQ, MPLAB, PIC, PICmicro, PICSTART and PRO MATE are registered trademarks of Microchip Technology Incorporated in the U.S.A. and other countries. FilterLab, microID, MXDEV, MXLAB, PICMASTER, SEEVAL and The Embedded Control Solutions Company are registered trademarks of Microchip Technology Incorporated in the U.S.A. dsPIC, dsPICDEM.net, ECONOMONITOR, FanSense, FlexROM, fuzzyLAB, In-Circuit Serial Programming, ICSP, ICEPIC, microPort, Migratable Memory, MPASM, MPLIB, MPLINK, MPSIM, PICC, PICDEM, PICDEM.net, rfPIC, Select Mode and Total Endurance are trademarks of Microchip Technology Incorporated in the U.S.A. and other countries. Serialized Quick Turn Programming (SQTP) is a service mark of Microchip Technology Incorporated in the U.S.A. All other trademarks mentioned herein are property of their respective companies. © 2002, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Printed in the U.S.A., All Rights Reserved. Printed on recycled paper. Microchip received QS-9000 quality system certification for its worldwide headquarters, design and wafer fabrication facilities in Chandler and Tempe, Arizona in July 1999 and Mountain View, California in March 2002. The Company’s quality system processes and procedures are QS-9000 compliant for its PICmicro® 8-bit MCUs, KEELOQ® code hopping devices, Serial EEPROMs, microperipherals, non-volatile memory and analog products. In addition, Microchip’s quality system for the design and manufacture of development systems is ISO 9001 certified.  2002 Microchip Technology Inc. DS00232A - page 11 WORLDWIDE SALES AND SERVICE AMERICAS Corporate Office 2355 West Chandler Blvd. Chandler, AZ 85224-6199 Tel: 480-792-7200 Fax: 480-792-7277 Technical Support: 480-792-7627 Web Address: http://www.microchip.com ASIA/PACIFIC Australia Microchip Technology Australia Pty Ltd Suite 22, 41 Rawson Street Epping 2121, NSW Australia Tel: 61-2-9868-6733 Fax: 61-2-9868-6755 Japan Microchip Technology Japan K.K. Benex S-1 6F 3-18-20, Shinyokohama Kohoku-Ku, Yokohama-shi Kanagawa, 222-0033, Japan Tel: 81-45-471- 6166 Fax: 81-45-471-6122 Rocky Mountain 2355 West Chandler Blvd. Chandler, AZ 85224-6199 Tel: 480-792-7966 Fax: 480-792-4338 China - Beijing Microchip Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Beijing Liaison Office Unit 915 Bei Hai Wan Tai Bldg. No. 6 Chaoyangmen Beidajie Beijing, 100027, No. China Tel: 86-10-85282100 Fax: 86-10-85282104 Korea Microchip Technology Korea 168-1, Youngbo Bldg. 3 Floor Samsung-Dong, Kangnam-Ku Seoul, Korea 135-882 Tel: 82-2-554-7200 Fax: 82-2-558-5934 Atlanta 500 Sugar Mill Road, Suite 200B Atlanta, GA 30350 Tel: 770-640-0034 Fax: 770-640-0307 Singapore Microchip Technology Singapore Pte Ltd. 200 Middle Road #07-02 Prime Centre Singapore, 188980 Tel: 65-6334-8870 Fax: 65-6334-8850 Boston 2 Lan Drive, Suite 120 Westford, MA 01886 Tel: 978-692-3848 Fax: 978-692-3821 China - Chengdu Microchip Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Chengdu Liaison Office Rm. 2401, 24th Floor, Ming Xing Financial Tower No. 88 TIDU Street Chengdu 610016, China Tel: 86-28-86766200 Fax: 86-28-86766599 Taiwan Microchip Technology (Barbados) Inc., Taiwan Branch 11F-3, No. 207 Tung Hua North Road Taipei, 105, Taiwan Tel: 886-2-2717-7175 Fax: 886-2-2545-0139 Chicago 333 Pierce Road, Suite 180 Itasca, IL 60143 Tel: 630-285-0071 Fax: 630-285-0075 Dallas 4570 Westgrove Drive, Suite 160 Addison, TX 75001 Tel: 972-818-7423 Fax: 972-818-2924 China - Fuzhou Microchip Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Fuzhou Liaison Office Unit 28F, World Trade Plaza No. 71 Wusi Road Fuzhou 350001, China Tel: 86-591-7503506 Fax: 86-591-7503521 Detroit Tri-Atria Office Building 32255 Northwestern Highway, Suite 190 Farmington Hills, MI 48334 Tel: 248-538-2250 Fax: 248-538-2260 EUROPE Austria Microchip Technology Austria GmbH Durisolstrasse 2 A-4600 Wels Austria Tel: 43-7242-2244-399 Fax: 43-7242-2244-393 China - Shanghai Microchip Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Room 701, Bldg. B Far East International Plaza No. 317 Xian Xia Road Shanghai, 200051 Tel: 86-21-6275-5700 Fax: 86-21-6275-5060 Kokomo 2767 S. Albright Road Kokomo, Indiana 46902 Tel: 765-864-8360 Fax: 765-864-8387 Denmark Microchip Technology Nordic ApS Regus Business Centre Lautrup hoj 1-3 Ballerup DK-2750 Denmark Tel: 45 4420 9895 Fax: 45 4420 9910 Los Angeles 18201 Von Karman, Suite 1090 Irvine, CA 92612 Tel: 949-263-1888 Fax: 949-263-1338 China - Shenzhen Microchip Technology Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Liaison Office Rm. 1315, 13/F, Shenzhen Kerry Centre, Renminnan Lu Shenzhen 518001, China Tel: 86-755-82350361 Fax: 86-755-82366086 New York 150 Motor Parkway, Suite 202 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Tel: 631-273-5305 Fax: 631-273-5335 France Microchip Technology SARL Parc d’Activite du Moulin de Massy 43 Rue du Saule Trapu Batiment A - ler Etage 91300 Massy, France Tel: 33-1-69-53-63-20 Fax: 33-1-69-30-90-79 San Jose Microchip Technology Inc. 2107 North First Street, Suite 590 San Jose, CA 95131 Tel: 408-436-7950 Fax: 408-436-7955 China - Hong Kong SAR Microchip Technology Hongkong Ltd. Unit 901-6, Tower 2, Metroplaza 223 Hing Fong Road Kwai Fong, N.T., Hong Kong Tel: 852-2401-1200 Fax: 852-2401-3431 Germany Microchip Technology GmbH Steinheilstrasse 10 D-85737 Ismaning, Germany Tel: 49-89-627-144 0 Fax: 49-89-627-144-44 Toronto 6285 Northam Drive, Suite 108 Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1X5, Canada Tel: 905-673-0699 Fax: 905-673-6509 India Microchip Technology Inc. India Liaison Office Divyasree Chambers 1 Floor, Wing A (A3/A4) No. 11, O’Shaugnessey Road Bangalore, 560 025, India Tel: 91-80-2290061 Fax: 91-80-2290062 Italy Microchip Technology SRL Centro Direzionale Colleoni Palazzo Taurus 1 V. Le Colleoni 1 20041 Agrate Brianza Milan, Italy Tel: 39-039-65791-1 Fax: 39-039-6899883 United Kingdom Microchip Ltd. 505 Eskdale Road Winnersh Triangle Wokingham Berkshire, England RG41 5TU Tel: 44 118 921 5869 Fax: 44-118 921-5820 08/01/02 DS00232A-page 12  2002 Microchip Technology Inc.